The Vietnamese Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Sign in
  • News
    • Vietnam Briefing
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
  • Opinion-Section
  • Society
  • Economy
  • About Us
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
  • News
    • Vietnam Briefing
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
  • Opinion-Section
  • Society
  • Economy
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
The Vietnamese Magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home Human Rights

Vietnam’s All-Powerful Legal Tool to Criminalize Civil Rights: “Abusing Democratic Freedoms”

Jason Nguyen by Jason Nguyen
14 March 2023
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0

Between Feb. 22 and 25, 2023, Vietnamese authorities detained [1] four people, including two lawyers, a State journalist, and a local Facebook user, on the allegations of “abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the state, lawful rights, and interests of organizations and/or citizens,” which violate Article 331 of Vietnam’s 2015 Penal Code. Most of the evidence collected to authorize their arrests was found on social media platforms, mainly Facebook.

The Vietnamese government has routinely deployed criminal charges from its legal playbook to suppress and intimidate regime critics and opposition voices. The most common accusations used by Hanoi include Article 117, which forbids the “distribution of anti-State materials,” Article 318, which criminalizes those who “cause public disorder,” and most recently, Article 200, which prohibits “tax evasion” activities levied against registered civil society leaders in the country.

But among those statutes, Article 331 of the current 2015 Penal Code, formerly Article 258 in the precedent 1999 Penal Code, is particularly concerning. Legal experts and lawyers have pointed out [2] that this legal provision’s vague wording and loosely interpreted definitions make it a catch-all offense that can be used to stifle freedom of expression in Vietnam.

According to Article 331, those who “abuse the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of association, and other democratic freedoms” to “infringe upon the rights and interests of other people and the State” are punishable by up to 36 months in prison. It also carries a maximum sentence of seven years if the defendant’s activities are found to inflict “a negative impact on social security, order, or safety.”

In reality, “abusing democratic freedoms” charges have mostly been used to prosecute commentators [3] who are allegedly found to “defame” government officials or State agencies on social media. At the same time, Vietnamese authorities have increasingly used this criminal code to handle cases involving libel and defamation between different civil plaintiffs, while these cases could be resolved in civil courts.

RELATED POSTS

Economic Triumphs and Human Rights Failures in the EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

Forced Confessions: Inside Việt Nam’s Judicial System 

The Fine of 7.5 Million Đồng: The Rising Cost of Free Speech on Social Media in Việt Nam

The 88 Project database [4], which documents the profiles of Vietnamese political activists, dissidents, and journalists, shows that 63 people have been arrested using Article 331 of the 2015 Penal Code, while six others were charged with the previous Article 258.

Unlike other politically motivated charges such as “distributing anti-State propaganda,” “subversion,” or “disrupting security,” which have often been levelled against political dissidents, Article 331 is used to target civil communities and individuals by criminalizing slander, libel, and defamation involving civil parties. Evidence collected by Vietnam’s investigation authorities to prosecute dissidents mostly consists of postings and live streamings published on social networking sites.

Shop and Support Independent Journalism
ADVERTISEMENT

According to The 88 Project database, those convicted of “abusing democratic freedoms” in Vietnam include independent and State journalists, [5] religious adherents, social media users and influencers, activists, scholars, and a former police officer.

In July 2022, six practitioners of Tinh That Bong Lai, [6] a local Buddhist temple, received more than 23 years in prison for allegedly defaming a monk from the government-controlled Vietnam Buddhist Church. In the latest development, three defense lawyers for the Tinh That Bong Lai members, Dang Dinh Manh, Ngo Thi Hoang Anh, and Dao Kim Lan, are being investigated by the Long An Provincial Security Investigation Office for their potential violation of Article 331. The alleged evidence comprises videos, postings, and live streams published by these lawyers on Facebook.

Earlier, in June 2022, Le Chi Thanh, [7] a former police captain, received a three-year sentence after he exposed wrongdoings within the public security forces and accused his superior of corruption in Youtube live streams. Meanwhile, Vietnamese scholar Nguyen Son Lo, [8] who authored many books offering advice to Vietnam’s leaders on politics, economics, and culture, was arrested last February under Article 331.

Although this legal provision is redundant and arbitrary, it is argued [9] by lawyers and legal experts to be an essential tool to protect the exclusive power of the Vietnamese government and the Communist regime. A similar catch-all offense, “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” [10] has also been frequently applied by Chinese authorities against activists who criticize the government or publish information about human rights or politics on social media.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Vietnam fined, arrested and prosecuted many online commentators for disseminating content on social media deemed to be “false” and “distorted.” Many Vietnamese citizens used social networks to express discontent with the government’s abusive antivirus policies. In June 2022, a Ho Chi Minh City resident was imprisoned [11] for one and a half years after his Facebook posting that described a man who killed himself because he was frustrated with Vietnam’s zero-COVID policy. This was declared to be fabricated.

Local critics and international human rights groups have condemned the government’s application of Article 331 on libel and defamation cases. They argue that it violates the principles of freedom of speech and press as enshrined in the Vietnamese Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Vietnam ratified in 1982.

On January 1, 2022, 86 individuals and civil society organizations in Vietnam and overseas introduced [12] a petition calling for the abolition and amendment of three controversial articles in Vietnam’s 2015 Penal Code, including Article 331. The petition claimed that “abusing democratic freedoms” is the “most bizarre” legal provision, intentionally enacted to trample on basic human rights guaranteed in the country’s Constitution and international covenants to which Vietnam is a signatory.

Multiple rights advocates, including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Article 19, and the International Commission of Jurists, in a joint statement [13] released in October 2022, requested Vietnam to put an end to rights-abusing laws such as Article 117 and Article 331. The statement also urged the government to drop all charges against human rights defenders, activists, and journalists arbitrarily detained and charged under these laws.


Footnotes:

[1] The Vietnamese. Magazine, (February 27, 2023). Vietnam Abstains from UN General Assembly Demanding the Withdrawal of Russian Troops from Ukraine. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2023/02/vietnam-abstains-from-un-general-assembly-demanding-the-withdrawal-of-russian-troops-from-ukraine/

[2] Trinh, Huu Long, (May 6, 2022). Article 331 Of The Vietnam Penal Code Is Completely Redundant. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/05/article-331-of-the-vietnam-penal-code-is-completely-redundant/

[3] Nam, N. (September 15, 2022). Lãnh án tù vì lợi dụng các quyền tự do dân chủ. Báo Pháp Luật TP. Hồ Chí Minh. https://plo.vn/lanh-an-tu-vi-loi-dung-cac-quyen-tu-do-dan-chu-post698709.html

[4] Database. (April 1, 2021). The 88 Project. https://the88project.org/database/

[5] The Vietnamese Magazine,  (2022b, January 27). Vietnam: Appellate Court Upholds Convictions of Bao Sach’s Journalists. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/01/vietnam-appellate-court-upholds-convictions-of-bao-sachs-journalists/

[6] Nguyen, Jason (July 23, 2022). Tinh That Bong Lai Practitioners Sentenced To Combined More Than 23 Years In Prison. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/07/tinh-that-bong-lai-practitioners-sentenced-to-combined-more-than-23-years-in-prison/

[7] The Reporter (June 23, 2022). Former Police Captain Receives 3 Years In Prison Under Article 331. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/06/former-police-captain-receives-3-years-in-prison-under-article-331/

[8] The Vietnamese Magazine, (February 13, 2023). CIVICUS Report: Vietnam Continues with Suppression of Journalists and Political Dissidents Despite Recent Election to UN Human Rights Council. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2023/02/vietnam-briefing-civicus-report-vietnam-continues-with-suppression-of-journalists-and-political-dissidents-despite-recent-election-to-un-human-rights-council/

[9] Ibid., [2]

[10] What is the Chinese crime of ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’? ( August 25, 2021). South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3146188/picking-quarrels-and-provoking-trouble-how-chinas-catch-all

[11] The Vietnamese Magazine (, June 27, 2022). Vietnam Briefing: Vietnam Continues Using Article 331 To Suppress Human Rights. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/06/vietnam-briefing-continues-using-article-331-to-suppress-human-rights/

[12] The Vietnamese Magazine (January 5, 2022). The 117 Petition: Individuals And Civil Organizations Call For The Abolition Of Vietnam’s Controversial Laws. The Vietnamese Magazine. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2022/01/the-117-petition-individuals-and-civil-organizations-call-for-the-abolition-of-vietnams-controversial-laws/

[13] Vietnam: UN Human Rights Council Candidacy Demands Progress on Human Rights. (2022, October 10). Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/10/10/vietnam-un-human-rights-council-candidacy-demands-progress-human-rights

Like this:

Like Loading...
Tags: Article 331Freedom of ExpressionHuman Rights
Jason Nguyen

Jason Nguyen

Nguyen focuses on vulnerable communities: ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+, activists, and Vietnam War refugees, challenging the Vietnamese government's official narratives on social and political issues.

Related Posts

Economic Triumphs and Human Rights Failures in the EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
Human Rights

Economic Triumphs and Human Rights Failures in the EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

6 February 2026
The Fine of 7.5 Million Đồng: The Rising Cost of Free Speech on Social Media in Việt Nam
Human Rights

The Fine of 7.5 Million Đồng: The Rising Cost of Free Speech on Social Media in Việt Nam

4 February 2026
Việt Nam’s Silence on Iranian Unrest Shows the Limits—and Morality—of its Diplomacy
Human Rights

Việt Nam’s Silence on Iranian Unrest Shows the Limits—and Morality—of its Diplomacy

28 January 2026
Are Vietnamese Values Compatible with Universal Human Rights?
Human Rights

Are Vietnamese Values Compatible with Universal Human Rights?

21 January 2026
Việt Nam’s Law on the State of Emergency: A Risk to Human Rights?
Human Rights

Việt Nam’s Law on the State of Emergency: A Risk to Human Rights?

15 January 2026
Zalo’s 45-Day Deadline and the Identity Data Crisis in Việt Nam
Human Rights

Zalo’s 45-Day Deadline and the Identity Data Crisis in Việt Nam

9 January 2026
Next Post

Two Defense Lawyers of Buddhist Temple Tinh That Bong Lai Summoned on Allegations of “Abusing Democratic Freedoms”

Ke Huy Quan, Sinophobia, and the Controversy Surrounding His Vietnamese Cultural Identity

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Recommended Stories

Police Question High School Student Over His Private Social Media Post Critical of the Communist Party

5 September 2024

Dien Nguyen An Luong’s New Report: A Study Of Vietnam’s Control Over Online Antistate Content

5 March 2022

Vietnam: Seven State Secrets About Religions That May Surprise You

16 August 2021

Popular Stories

  • Việt Nam 2025: 9 Key Events That Reshaped the Country

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • EU-Việt Nam Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Sparks Promise of Defense Technology Cooperation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Announcement: The Vietnamese Magazine Introduces a Reader-Funded Business Model

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Inside the Vạn Thịnh Phát Scandal: Trương Mỹ Lan’s Rise and Fall

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The First 18 Months: Assessing Tô Lâm’s Impact on Việt Nam

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
The Vietnamese Magazine

Published since 2017 by Legal Initiatives for Vietnam — a 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization.

U.S. Office: Legal Initiatives for Vietnam, 1520 E. Covell Suite B5 – 426, Davis, California, United States 95616

Taiwan Office: 美國法治越南台灣分部, 4th Floor, RIIC Building, National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, Zhinan Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan (ROC) 116

editor@thevietnamese.org

  • The Vietnamese’s Story
  • Submission
  • Sign in
No Result
View All Result
  • Sign in

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Discover more from The Vietnamese Magazine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

%d